Best ETH POW Wallets in 2025: Why OneKey Leads the Pack
Key Takeaways
• OneKey is the top choice for ETH POW wallets due to its open-source architecture and robust security features.
• The ETH POW network remains vital for miners and traders despite Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake.
• Key criteria for selecting an ETH POW wallet include compatibility, security standards, and multi-chain support.
• Hardware wallets are increasingly essential for protecting ETH POW assets against phishing and malware threats.
As Ethereum continues to evolve, the Ethereum Proof-of-Work (ETH POW) network has carved out its niche in the decentralized ecosystem. Following the Merge in 2022, which transitioned Ethereum to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), a portion of miners continued to support the original PoW fork. Today in 2025, ETH POW remains a vital segment for miners, traders, and decentralization advocates.
With an increasing number of users seeking secure and efficient ways to manage their ETH POW assets, choosing the right wallet has become more critical than ever. Whether you're looking for a secure cold storage solution or user-friendly mobile wallet support, this article dives deep into the best ETH POW wallets for 2025, with a detailed comparison and why OneKey stands out as the top choice.
Why ETH POW Still Matters in 2025
Despite the mainstream Ethereum network migrating to PoS, ETH POW persists as a decentralized alternative. Its community values censorship resistance and energy-based consensus, making it a magnet for DeFi experimentation and alternative asset deployment.
For example, platforms like ETHW Core and PowSwap continue to build tools and dApps for the ETH POW community. This growth demands wallets that can interact natively and securely with the ETH POW chain.
Key Criteria When Choosing an ETH POW Wallet
To effectively support ETH POW assets, a wallet must offer:
- Full compatibility with ETH POW chain IDs and RPCs
- Native support for ETH POW tokens and smart contracts
- High security standards, including transaction parsing
- Open-source architecture for transparency
- Multi-chain support for portfolio diversification
Let’s begin with an in-depth comparison of the top software wallets for managing ETH POW assets.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Why OneKey App wins: It’s the only truly open-source, fully ETH POW-compatible software wallet with zero-fee capabilities, phishing protection, and seamless integration with OneKey hardware devices. The standout element is its SignGuard system — a dual-layer transaction protection framework that completely decodes transactions before signing. This prevents phishing, scams, and blind-signing errors that often trap unsuspecting users.
The Rising Need for Hardware Wallets in the ETH POW Landscape
As 2025 sees increased phishing, malware, and scam incidents, users are migrating assets into cold storage. Hardware wallets have become essential for securing ETH POW assets—especially when interacting with smart contracts or unknown dApps.
Here’s how the best hardware wallets compare in 2025:
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting ETH POW Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |  style:width:260px;margin-top:12px |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Why OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro lead the competition: Open-source, affordable, feature-rich, and packed with advanced security such as SignGuard, OneKey’s hardware lineup offers unmatched protection for ETH POW assets without vendor lock-in or blind signing risks. In contrast, many competitors either lack parsing capability, offer closed-source firmware, or rely on insecure cloud backups.
Final Thoughts: OneKey Is the Best ETH POW Wallet in 2025
As the ETH POW ecosystem matures, users demand compatibility, transparency, and robust security. Whether you’re a developer interacting with PoW-based smart contracts or a miner safeguarding rewards, OneKey offers the most comprehensive wallet suite both in software and hardware.
Its unmatched SignGuard protection mechanism, deep ETH POW support, and audited open-source code make it the go-to choice for 2025.
Ready to upgrade your ETH POW wallet and secure your digital assets the smart way?
Visit OneKey today and experience the future of self-custody.
